Statistical analysis

Our expert statisticians undertake a wide range of analyses using established and novel techniques. We work with you to discuss the options available and select the optimal statistical approach for your needs.

All our analyses come with clear and comprehensive reports for transparency and ease of interpretation. 

Statistical analysis

Strategic advice on analysis

Our statistical consultants have a wealth of experience as members of HTA committees, method committees and advisory boards. This makes us uniquely placed to provide strategic advice on the implications of different approaches for economic evaluation. Our directors have published extensively in statistical methodology, and are able to provide specialist advice on complex and cutting-edge statistical techniques where required. 

Survival analysis

We conduct parametric and non-parametric survival analysis of time-to-event data, including extrapolation and proportional hazards/accelerated failure time testing. We also undertake more complex modelling where required, including: piecewise and spline-based methods, mixture/cure models, competing risks and time-shifted analysis such as assessment schedule matching. 

Adjustment for treatment switching

Treatment switching is common in clinical trials, whether incidental or by design. In such scenarios, a standard intention-to-treat analyses will not identify the true comparative effectiveness of the treatments under investigation. We have expertise in statistical methods to address this issue, including inverse-probability-of-censoring weighting (IPCW), two-stage estimation (TSE), and rank preserving structural failure time models (RPSFTM).

Additional analysis of clinical trial data

We can help unlock further insights from your trial data using additional analyses and combining it with other data sources where necessary. For example, there may be value in further subgroup analyses to investigate heterogeneity and identify patient groups in which the intervention is most effective. Other applications include developing risk prediction models, investigating subsequent treatment pathways, or analysing process outcomes to inform future trial planning. We work with you to identify research questions and advise on the most appropriate techniques.

Utility mapping and analysis

Economic evaluations typically require generic preference-based measures of health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) such as the EQ-5D. We can map results from disease-specific HRQoL instruments to these measures,  identify the appropriate mapping algorithm and apply suitable tariffs for different countries. We can also conduct repeated measure analyses and provide time-dependent health-state utilities as inputs for cost-effective models.

Surrogate endpoint analysis

Surrogate endpoints such as biomarkers are typically observed earlier than the true outcome of interest that directly measures clinical benefit, and may be used in trials as a substitute to predict treatment effect, particularly if the outcome of interest is rare or requires long follow-up. We can conduct exploratory analysis of potential surrogate endpoints using empirical data, or perform surrogate endpoint validation using meta-analysis, depending on the level of evidence available.

Study design and analysis

We can advise on the design and analysis of clinical studies, including sample size calculations and randomization procedures, and prepare or review the statistical sections of protocols. We can help with the design and review of data collection forms, and draft statistical analysis plans.

We have extensive experience in the design and analysis of large retrospective/prospective cohort studies, case-control studies, cross-sectional surveys and routine datasets/registries. 

Joint modelling

Joint modelling is a rapidly developing area of biostatistical research that models longitudinal and time-to-event data simultaneously. We have experience in applying this novel approach as an alternative to traditional survival modelling to help improve survival predictions from limited follow-up data. Joint models can effectively adjust the estimation of biomarker profiles in the presence of informative drop-out, helping to reduce the potential bias introduced by missing data or measurement errors. They can also predict the time-to-event outcome for censored patients conditional upon their biomarker profile up to a specific time point, and incorporate multiple biomarkers into a single model. 

Statistical validation 

We offer statistical validation services based on your level of need, from review of program code and quality control checks to full independent parallel programming. We can also review statistical reports, checking for accuracy, consistency and interpretation, and conduct cross-checking with program outputs.

Study steering/data monitoring committee advisory services

Study steering and data monitoring committees oversee the conduct and performance of randomized controlled trials and observational studies, independently from the investigator group. Our statistical consultants have considerable experience of committee membership in a range of disease areas, providing expertise and advice to investigators, and making recommendations to stakeholders.

Case studies

Joint modelling of survival data

Joint modelling of survival data

We addressed the challenge of modelling the association between a longitudinal biomarker and overall survival to enhance outcome predictions in an oncology treatment trial. 

Component network meta-analysis of combination treatments for a blood cancer

Component network meta-analysis of combination treatments for a blood cancer

Estimate the comparative effectiveness of new blood cancer treatment given complex evidence base: disconnected network of RCTs and multiple treatment combinations evaluated

Indirect treatment comparison accounting for the differently timed scheduled assessments

Indirect treatment comparison accounting for the differently timed scheduled assessments

We addressed the challenge of interval-censored time-to-event outcomes in indirect treatment comparisons (ITCs), where differing assessment schedules could introduce bias.